United Commercial Syndicate

The United Commercial Syndicate took over the management of the Wilts and Berks Canal in 1891 from the 1876 Company. Under the management of W.J. Ainsworth, the Syndicate attempted to revitalize the struggling waterway through significant infrastructure investment and new operational strategies.

Financial Management and Investment

The Syndicate raised funds through several channels to support their efforts:

  • Loans and Mortgages: They raised £4,489 by mortgaging Coate Reservoir and the annual water payments from the Great Western Railway (GWR).
  • Lord Wantage: A major benefactor, Lord Wantage, advanced £10,000 to the Syndicate and provided the £4,489 for the mortgage, which was later transferred to him as security.
  • Debentures: Additional capital was raised through 5 percent debentures.
  • Infrastructure Spending: The Syndicate spent approximately £16,000 on dredging and lock repairs, which successfully put the section between Semington and Swindon into "substantially efficient working order".

The Fast Boat Experiment

In an effort to boost commerce, the Syndicate formed its own separate carrying organization. They operated a service of twelve regular fast boats. However, this venture was a failure:

  • Lack of New Trade: The service did not create new business; instead, it simply took existing trade away from original boatmen.
  • Financial Loss: The independent boatmen lost £840 in less than two years, and the Syndicate’s own carrying concern lost £843.

Operational Decline and Bankruptcy

Despite the initial repairs, the canal's condition deteriorated quickly. By 1894, the canal had silted up to a depth of two feet, reducing boat capacity from 35 tons to just 18 tons. By 1897, the Syndicate was practically bankrupt and convinced the canal could not be a commercial success.

The Struggle for Abandonment

The Syndicate spent years attempting to legally divest itself of the canal:

  • Warrant of Abandonment: In 1897, they applied for a warrant of abandonment under the Railway and Canal Act of 1888 to seek relief from their liability to maintain the waterway.
  • Opposition: Their application faced heavy opposition from Swindon traders, who viewed the stagnant water as a "noisome" health hazard, and from landowners who relied on the canal for watering cattle.
  • Technical Failure: A Board of Trade enquiry in 1900 ended in failure for the Syndicate due to a technicality regarding a provisional agreement they had made to keep the North Wilts branch open.

Dissolution and the 1914 Act

The Syndicate’s involvement finally ended with the 1914 Act, which authorized the transfer of Coate Reservoir and the Swindon portion of the canal to the Swindon Corporation for £10,000. The Act mandated the winding up of the Syndicate once its financial affairs were settled.

In the final distribution of funds, Lady Wantage (widow of Lord Wantage) received £7,000, which was significantly less than the total principal and interest owed to her husband's estate, which amounted to over £16,000. The Syndicate was also required to pay £2,500 to road authorities for bridge transfers before it could be fully dissolved.

More